Tampilkan postingan dengan label linguistic. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label linguistic. Tampilkan semua postingan

Selasa, 28 April 2015

code mixing and code switching



Definition of Code

----In communications, a code is a rule for converting a piece of information (for example, a letter, word, or phrase) into another form or representation, not necessarily of the same sort. In communications and information processing, encoding is the process by which a source (object) performs this conversion of information into data, which is then sent to a receiver (observer), such as a data processing system (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code)
In semiotics, the concept of a code is of fundamental importance. Saussure emphasized that signs only acquire meaning and value when they are interpreted in relation to each other. He believed that the relationship between the signifier and the signified was arbitrary. Hence, interpreting signs requires familiarity with the sets of conventions or codes currently in use to communicate meaning…...
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code (Semiotics))
In the context of cryptography, a code is a method used to transform a message into an obscured form, preventing those not in on the secret from understanding what is actually transmitted. The usual method is to use a codebook with a list of common phrases or words matched with a codeword. Messages in code are sometimes termed codetext. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code (cryptography))
In computer programming, the word code refers to instructions to a computer in a programming language. In this usage, the noun "code" typically stands for source code, and the verb "to code" means to write source code, to program. This usage may have originated when the first symbolic languages were developed and were punched onto cards as "codes”.
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code (computer- programming))
The term code is a relatively neutral conceptualization of a linguistic variety—be it a language or a dialect. Romaine (1995) mentions that: “I will use the term ‘code’ here in a general sense to refer not only to different language, but also to varieties of the same language as well as styles within a language.” However, not many researchers really explicate the term in their definition. In this study, code will be taking as a verbal component that can be as small as a morpheme or as comprehensive and complex as the entire system of language.

 Different between Code-switching and Code-mixing

Several scholars have attempted to define code-switching and code-mixing. Among them are Amuda (1989), Atoye (1994) and Belly (1976). For instance, Hymes defines only code-switching as “a common term for alternative use of two or more language, varieties of a language or even speech styles. “while Bokamba (1989) defines both concepts thus: “Code-switching is the mixing of words, phrases and sentences from two distinct grammatical (sub)systems across sentence boundaries within the same speech event… code-mixing is the embedding of various linguistic units such as affixes (bound morphemes), words (unbound morphemes), phrases and clauses from a cooperative activity where the participants, in order to in infer what is intended, must reconcile what they hear with what they understand. “
Code switching is not a display of deficient language knowledge: a grammarless mixing of two languages. Instead it is a phenomenon through which its users express a range of meanings. By code switching, which occurs mostly in conversation, the choice of speech alerts the participants to the interaction of the context and social dimension within which the conversation is taking place. The phenomenon of code switching is examined from a conversational analysis perspective, and as such is viewed as interactive exchanges between members of a bilingual speech community.
Very often the expression code mixing is used synonymously with code switching and means basically intra-sentential code switching. However, recent research has given new meaning to this term. Maschler (1998) defines code mixing or a mixed code as “using two languages such that a third, new code emerges, in which elements from the two languages are incorporated into a structurally definable pattern” (p.125) In other words, the code mixing hypothesis states that when two code switched languages constitute the appearance of a third code it has structural characteristics special to that new code.

Types of Code- switching and Code- mixing

There are many kinds of code-switching. Code-switching can be either intersentential, intrasentential or Tag- switching.
In intersentential code-switching, the language switch is done at sentence boundaries. This is seen most often between fluent bilingual speakers. Sometimes I will start a sentence in English y terminό in español. (Poplack 1980)
In intrasentential code-switching, the shift is done in the middle of a sentence, with no interruptions, hesitations, or pauses indicating a shift. It often happens within one sentence or even a one phrase. The speaker is usually unaware of the switch, until after the fact, and for example, you have to find a kalo pedi (good guy) and marry him. (English-Greek)
The first type of language switching is known as mechanical switching. It occurs unconsciously, and fills in unknown or unavailable terms in one language. This type of code-switching is also known as code-mixing. Code-mixing occurs when a speaker is momentarily unable to remember a term, but is able to recall it in a different language.
Another type of code switching, known as code-changing, is characterized by fluent intrasentential shifts, transferring focus from one language to another. It is motivated by situational and stylistic factors, and the conscious nature of the switch between two languages is emphasized (Lipski, 1985, p. 12).
The third type of code- switching is Tag- switching. This involves the insertion of a tag in one language into an utterance that is otherwise entirely in the other language. We can see example, so he asked me for money, znas #, I had to say no, znas #. The tag here is Serbian for ‘you know’.
Code-mixing is one of the major kinds of language choice which is subtler than ‘code- switching’, as stated by Fasold (1984). In code- mixed sentences, pieces of the one language are used while a speaker is basically using another language.

Sumber : http://www.grin.com/en/e-book/92496/code-switching-and-code-mixing

creole and pidgin



THE HISTORY OF PIDGINS AND CREOLE

Pidgins and creole are new language varieties, which developed out of contacts between colonial nonstandard varieties of a European language and several non-European languages around the Atlantic and in the Indian and Pacific Oceans during the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. Pidgins typically emerged in trade colonies which developed around trade forts or along trade routes, such as on the coast of West Africa. They are reduced in structures and specialized in functions (typically trade), and initially they served as non-native lingua francas to users who preserved their native vernaculars for their day-to-day interactions. Some pidgins have expanded into regular vernaculars, especially in urban settings, and are called `expanded pidgins.' Examples include Bislama and Tok Pisin (in Melanesia) and Nigerian and Cameroon Pidgin English. Structurally, they are as complex as Creoles.
The terms Creole and pidgin have also been extended to some other varieties that developed during the same period out of contacts among primarily non- European languages. Examples include Delaware Pidgin, Chinook Jargon, and Mobilian in North America; Sango, (Kikongo-)Kituba, and Lingala in Central Africa, Kinubi in Southern Sudan and in Uganda; and Hiri Motu in Papua New Guinea (Holm 1989, Smith 1995)
Mufwene (2001) emphasizes that Creoles and pidgins developed in separate places, in which Europeans and non-Europeans interacted differently –sporadically in trade colonies (which produced pidgins) but regularly in the initial stages of settlement colonies (where Creoles developed).
The term `Creole' was originally coined in Iberian colonies, apparently in the sixteenth century, in reference to non indigenous people born in the American colonies. It was adopted in metropolitan Spanish, then in French and later in English by the early seventeenth century. By the second half of the same century, it was generalized to descendants of Africans or Europeans born in Romance colonies. Usage varied from one colony to another. The term was also used as an adjective to characterize plants, animals, and customs typical of the same colonies.
Creole may not have applied widely to language varieties until the late eighteenth century. Such usage may have been initiated by metropolitan Europeans to disfranchise particular colonial varieties of their languages. It is not clear how the term became associated only with vernaculars spoken primarily by descendants of non-Europeans. Nonetheless, several speakers of Creoles (or pidgins) actually believe they speak dialects of their lexifiers.
Among the earliest claims that Creoles developed from pidgins is the following statement in Bloomfield (1933, p. 474): `when the jargon [i.e., pidgin] has become the only language of the subject group, it is a creolized language.' Hall (1962) reinterpreted this, associating the vernacular function of Creoles with nativization. Thus, Creoles have been defined inaccurately as `nativized pidgins,' i.e., pidgins that have acquired native speakers and have therefore expanded both their structures and functions and have stabilized. Hall then also introduced the pidgin-Creole `life-cycle' to which DeCamp (1971) added a `post-Creole' stage.
The first creolist to dispute this connection was Alleyne (1971). He argued that fossilized inflectional morphology in Haitian Creole (HC) and the like is evidence that Europeans did not communicate with the Africans in foreigner or baby talk, which would have fostered pidgins on the plantations.
It has also been claimed that Creoles have more or less the same structural design (Bickerton, 1984). This position is as disputable as the counterclaim that they are more similar in the socio historical ecologies of their developments, or even the more recent claim that there are Creole prototypes from which others deviate in various ways (McWhorter 1998). The very fact of resorting to a handful of prototypes for the general Creole structural category suggests that the vast majority of them do not share the putative set of defining features, hence that the features cannot be used to single them out as a unique type of language. On the other hand, variation in the structural features of Creoles (lexified by the same language) is correlated with variation in the linguistic and sociohistorical ecologies of their developments (Mufwene 2001). The notion of `ecology' includes, among other things, the nature of the lexifier, structural features of the substrate languages, changes in the ethnolinguistic makeup of the populations that came in contact, the kinds of interactions between speakers of the lexifier and those of other languages, and rates and modes of population growth.
To date the best known Creoles have been lexified by English and French. Those of the Atlantic and Indian Ocean are, along with Hawaiian Creole, those that have informed most theorizing on the development of Creoles. While the terms `Creole' and `creolization' have often been applied uncritically to various contact-induced language varieties, several distinctions, which are not clearly articulated have also been proposed, for instance, between pidgin, Creole, koine! , semi-Creole, intertwined varieties, foreign workers' varieties of European languages (e.g., Gastarbeiter Deutsch), and `indigenized varieties' of European languages (e.g., Nigerian and Singaporean English). The denotations and importance of these terms deserve re-examining.  THE DEFENITION OF PIDGINS AND CREOLE
Most studies of pidgins and Creoles (PC) have focused on their origins, despite an undeniable increase during the 1990s in the number of works on structural features
 Pidgins
 A Pidgin, or contact language, is the name given to any language created, usually spontaneously, out of a mixture of other languages as a means of communication between speakers of different tongues. Pidgins have rudimentary grammars and restricted vocabulary, serving as auxiliary contact languages. They are improvised rather than learned natively.
Pidgin language (origin in Engl. word `business'?) is nobody's native language; may arise when two speakers of different languages with no common language try to have a makeshift conversation. Lexicon usually comes from one language, structure often from the other. Because of colonialism, slavery etc. the prestige of Pidgin languages is very low. Many pidgins are `contact vernaculars', may only exist for one speech event.
A pidgin is “ a language with a reduced range of structure and use, with NO native speakers.” It grows up among people who do not share a common language but who want to communicate with each other.
(Source: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language).
A pidgin, or contact language, is the name given to any language created, usually spontaneously, out of a mixture of other languages as a means of communication between speakers of different tongues. Pidgins have simple grammars and few synonyms, serving as auxiliary contact languages. They are learned as second languages rather than natively.
Some pidgins have expanded into regular vernaculars, especially in urban settings, and are called `expanded pidgins.' Examples include Bislama and Tok Pisin (in Melanesia) and Nigerian and Cameroon Pidgin English. 
 Creole
Creole (orig. person of European descent born and raised in a tropical colony) is a language that was originally a pidgin but has become nativized, i.e. a community of speakers claims it as their first language. Next used to designate the language(s) of people of Caribbean and African descent in colonial and ex-colonial countries (Jamaica, Haiti, Mauritius, Réunion, Hawaii, Pitcairn, etc.)
A creole is “a pidgin which has become the mother tongue of a community,” and therefore has native speakers (Source: The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language).
            A creole language, or just creole, is a well-defined and stable language that originated from a non-trivial combination of two or more languages, typically with many distinctive features that are not inherited from either parent. All creole languages evolved from pidgins, usually those that have become the native language of a community. The most kinds of pidgin but now be a creol as like Melanesia pidgin (Tok Pisin in Papua New Guinea. Another example from this is Bislama pidgins in Vanuatu.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF PIDGIN AND CREOLE
 The Development Of Pidgin
A Pidgin, or contact language, is the name given to any language created, usually spontaneously, out of a mixture of other languages as a means of communication between speakers of different tongues. Pidgins have rudimentary grammars and restricted vocabulary, serving as auxiliary contact languages. They are improvised rather than learned natively.
As they develop, they can replace the existing mix of languages to become the native language of the current community (such as Krio in Sierra Leone and Tok Pisin in Papua New Guinea). This stage requires the pidgin to be learned natively by children, who then generalize the features of the pidgin into a fully-formed, stabilized grammar (see Nicaraguan Sign Language). When a pidgin reaches this point it acquires the full complexity of a natural language, and becomes a creole language. However, pidgins do not always become creoles - they can die out or become obsolete.
The concept originated in Europe among the merchants and traders in the Mediterranean in the Middle Ages, who used Lingua Franca or Sabir. Another well-known pidgin is the Beach-la-Mar of the South Seas, based on English but incorporating Malay, Chinese, and Portuguese words. Bislama, as it is now called in Vanuatu, is fairly mutually intelligible with Tok Pisin.
Caribbean pidgin is the result of colonialism. As tropical islands were colonised their society was restructured, with a ruling minority of some European nation and a large mass of non-European laborers. The laborers, both natives and slaves, would often come from many different language groups and would need to communicate. This led to the development of pidgins.
The word is derived from the Chinese pronunciation of the English word business. Pidgin English was the name given to a Chinese-English-Portuguese pidgin used for commerce in Canton during the 18th and 19th centuries. Some scholars dispute this derivation of the word "pidgin", and suggest alternative etymologies, but no alternative has been deemed convincing enough to garner widespread support. In Canton, this contact language was called Canton English.
   The Development Of Creole
In linguistic, creole is pidgin which from time to time and from one generation to the next generation that continues to develop into a variety of languages​​. By the time adults use pidgin as an intermediate language, a group of children or grandchildren they acquire and use the language as a first language (mother language).
For children or grandchildren, no longer called Pidgin, but creole.
Creole is also often referred to as the language Pijin that has native speakers. In the language of the user community Pidgin shift or different naming of the language used. Pijin for the older generation, and Creole to the younger generation.
At the level of creole, grammar and vocabulary begin to intricate and complex. Creole is a language extension Pidgin, both grammatical complexity and vocabulary. Expansion of Pidgin be equated with creole languages ​​in other countries that have it.
There are hundreds of different creole languages ​​in the world. Example is the creole language Tok Pisin in Papua New Guinea, Papiamentu in Arubia, South Venezuela, Curacao and Bonaire Leeward islands of the Netherlands Antilles (influenced by Portuguese, English and Spanish). Haitian Creole in the Caribbean, the western part of the island of Hispaniola (having six million speakers). The speakers can be found throughout the Caribbean and North American comunity, and creole from Dominica (influenced by Spanish, French and English).
 THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT FROM PIDGIN TO CREOL
In general, overall language can be changed. Sometimes the language changes occur in a short time as a result of contact between two languages ​​used by people with backgrounds different languages. In such circumstances may arise that name pidgin. Pidgin usually have a very simple grammar with a vocabulary of different languages ​​so that mixing the two elements of the language led to a mixture of languages.
A pidgin has no native speakers (native speakers). If you have a native speaker's language is called a creole language. So, creole is a pidgin development that has had a parent language (mother tongue). Some languages ​​are considered creole language in Indonesia, among others, is the Malay language and Betawi Malay Ambon. So, creole is the result of language contact as well which is the development of a pidgin.
Pidgin creole arises when a mother tongue in a particular community. The structure is still describe the structure of pidgin, creole but called for being their mother tongue. Pidgin can be a creole when the foreign speakers and used by his descendants were then frozen as their first language. It just said creole pidgin language if this has been going on for generations.
Creoles have more speakers than pidgin. Because creoles evolved through his children and grandchildren, and only a pidgin language of the original. When someone mentions a creole language, then the language should have first been proven historically about its origins. Because in determining whether or not a creole, a language historically has a very important role and have a very close relationship.
Creolization is a linguistic development that occurs because the two languages ​​in contact for a long time which is pidgin speakers had breed. And so on if creole able to survive and continue berkembanga it would creole language bias to larger and more complete example is the language of Sierra Leone in West Africa which later became the national language.
Creole language developed from pidgin language. First of all, a language is used as a first language in an area, then the youth, especially the merchants, activities interaction by trade.
From various origins traders, when they interact with other countries that are much different languages ​​have either structural or functional, so they created a new language with quotes, and to paraphrase of their own languages ​​understood by all traders concerned that they are able to interact well. First language in an area that depends on whether the area is the result of colony, who occupier, and the influence of what is left.

psycholinguistic



Psycholinguistic

A.      Child Language Development Theory
In this case there are three views or theories in child language development. Two controversial views expressed by experts from the United States, namely natives view which argues that language acquisition in childhood is natural (nature). And the view which argues THAT behaviorism language acquisition in childhood are "bribes" (nature). A third view emerged in Europe from Jean Piaget who found mastery of the language is derived from the ability of cognitive maturation, so the view is called cognitive.
1.       The Views Nativism        
Nativism found during first language acquisition process, a boy (man) gradually opens up the ability language genetically programmed. This view does not consider the environment has an influence in language acquisition, but rather assume that language is a biological, in line with the so-called "hypothetical gift of nature". The natives found that language is too complex and cumbersome, making it impossible can be learned in a short time through methods such as "imitation" (imitation). So, there must be some important aspects of the language system that already exists in man naturally.
According to Chomsky (1965, 1975) language can only be controlled by humans, animals may not be able to master the human language. This opinion is based on assumptions. First, the behavior of the language is something that is inherited (genetic); language development pattern is the same in all sorts of languages ​​and culture (is universal); and the environment has only a minor role in role in the maturation process of language. Second, the language can be mastered in a short time, four-year-old son was able to speak like an adult. Third, the language environment of the child cannot provide data sufficient for mastering complicated grammar of adults.
According to Chomsky, a child is equipped with a "tool of language acquisition" (language acquisition device (LAD). The instrument is a biological gift that has been programmed to specify the following items, which may be of a tat language, and regarded as a physiological part of the brain that is specialized for processing language, which has no relation to other cognitive abilities.
2.       The views Behaviorism
The behaviorism explains that first language acquisition process is controlled from the outside of the child, i.e. the stimulus provided by the environment. Language term for the behaviorism considered less appropriate because the term implies a form of language, something that is owned or used, and not something that is done. Though the language is one of behavior, among other human behaviors. According to the behaviorism ability to speak and understand the language of the child obtained through stimulation from the environment. Children are considered as passive recipients of pressure environment, do not have an active role in the development of verbal behavior. Even the behaviorism does not recognize the maturity of the child in language acquisition. The behaviorism does not recognize the view that children master the rules of the language and have the ability to abstracts important characteristic of the language in the environment. They argue stimulus (stimulus) of a particular environment reinforce language skills of children. Language development they see as an improvement of verbal expression that applies randomly to the actual ability to communicate through the principle of linkage S - P (stimulus - response) and the process of imitation-imitation.
3.       The views Cognitivism
Jean Piaget (1945) states that the language was not a natural characteristic of separate, but one among several capabilities derived from cognitive maturity. Language tart by reason, then the language must be grounded in the development of a more fundamental change and more common in cognition.
Chomsky argues language does not have a big impact on the maturation process language, the environment also Pieget found no major influence on the intellectual development of children. Changes or intellectual development of children is very dependent on the involvement of children actively with the environment.


B.      Motorik development
Motor means motion. Two of the ability to move the most attention of experts is walking and the use of the hand as a tool (Morgan, 1986). Various studies on children who are limited motion capability in the first months of his life shows evidence that lack of exercise does not alter the sequence of events that lead to runs. If exercise "walking" enriched, given more servings, perhaps the ability to walk can be obtained earlier; but the order does not change the ability of (Morgan, 1986). Motorik development is the development of babies born with the most visible.
C.      Social Development and Communications
Indeed, since the baby is born already "tuned" biologically to communicate, he would respond to the events that caused by those around him (especially his mother). Approximately 70% of the time Mother breastfeeding, the mother accompany her baby within 20 cm. Therefore, the baby will avenge his mother's gaze by looking at the mother's eyes caught his attention. Then the baby also learned that when a mutual eye contact means no communication, between the baby and the mother.
Babies are already actively involved in the process of interaction with his mother shortly after birth. He was responding to the voice and gestures of his mother, and watched her mother's face. In the first week of life he has mimicked the activities moving hands, stuck out his tongue and eye-opening. By the age of one month he began mimicking low height and short length ibu.nya voice.
At the age of 2 weeks he was able to distinguish the mother's face from other people's faces. At 3 weeks of age the baby smile can be called "social smile", smile because it is given as a social reaction to stimuli (such as face / voice mother) from the outside. In both infants more often "cooing" (cooing) sounds like the sound of doves. Cooing baby if she is in a state of happy, for example, because some company, invited talk, invites to play and so on.           
By the age of five months, babies begin to imitate sounds and gestures adults intentionally, so the more they increase vocabulary of facial expressions. Then at the age of five months he was able to speak with an attitude that shows Ra happy, resentment and curiosity.
At the age of six months there was a shift of interest, he is more interested in the body of the man. So since then, interaction becomes triad; baby, mother and objects.
Between the ages of seven to twelve months the child begins to have more control in the interaction with the mother. Children learn to express his desire or will be clearer and more effective.
D.      Cognitive Development
Cognitive terms related to mental events involved in the process of introduction of the world, which is a little much involve the mind or thought. Therefore, in general, said cognition bias is considered synonymous with the word thought or mind.
Piaget stated that there are several stages in a child's cognitive development. Stage it is :
1)      Sensomotorik Stage
This stage is the first stage in the cognitive development of children and held on in part of the first two years of his life, and in the second year appeared coordination of these two initial capability. At the end of the period of sensory baby can think about the world, which is related to the experiences and actions that simple.
2)      Preoperational stage
At this stage the way of "thinking" kids are still dominated by the way how things or objects that appear. The way of thinking is still lacking operational.
3)      Concrete operational stage
At this stage the children have understood the concept of the convention. This stage traversed children aged around seven to eleven years ahead.
4)      Formal operational stage.
At this stage the child passed after children aged 11 years and over, the kids are thinking logically as it is with adults. They formulate and test hypotheses complicated hypothesis-they think they are abstract and generalize the use of abstract concepts, from one situation to another (Morgan, 1986) .
E.       Language Development
Newborns to age one commonly referred to as infant means not being able to speak. This term is appropriate when associated with speak abilities. Infant language development can be divided into two; stage of development of articulation, and 2) the stage of development of the words and sentences (Poerwo, 1989).
1.       Articulation Development Stage
This stage is passed to infants between birth about 14 months old. Efforts toward "resulting in" the sounds that have started in the weeks since the birth of the baby. This resulted in the development of sound called articulation development, through which a baby through a series of stages as follows.
a.       sound Resonance
Income sound, which occurs in the oral cavity, can not be separated from the activity and motor development in the baby's mouth. The most common sounds that can be made is the sound of a baby crying because they feel uncomfortable or feel hungry and sounds as coughing, sneezing, and belching. Besides, there is also the sound is not the sound of weeping called "quasi-resonance, the sound is not there yet fully consonant and vowel contains resonance.
b.      cooing sounds
Approaching the age of two months the baby has developed muscle control to start and stop the mouth of steady motion. At this stage the sound of laughter and the sound of cooing (cooking) has been sounded. The cooing sounds somewhat similar to the sound [o] on pigeons. The resulting sound is a consonant sound with vocals back and middle back, but with the full resonance. Consonant sounds similar to the sound [s] and velar sounds similar to the sound [k] and [g].
c.       Sound Berleter
Berleter is making an unusual noise continuously without purpose. Berleter is usually done by infants aged between four to six months.
d.       Sound Berleter Birthday
This stage traversed the children aged between six to ten months. Initial consonants can be spoken is labial sounds [p] and [b], the sound of bubbling alveolar [t] and [d], nasal sound [j]. The most commonly heard is the sound of the syllable which is a series of consonants and vocals like "ba-ba-ba" or "ma-ma-ma".


e.       sound Vocable
The variable is the sound that is almost like the word, but it has no meaning and is not an imitation of adults. Vocable can be generated by a child between the ages of 11 to 14 months.
2.       The development phase of Words and Sentences
ability variable followed by the ability to say the word, and say simple sentences, and sentences more perfect.          
a. First word
The ability to say the first word is determined by the mastery of articulation, and the ability to associate words with objects that become referral to (de Vilers, 1097 in Purwo, 1989). At this stage, children tend to simplify the pronunciation is done systematically.
b. Sentence One Word           
The first word uttered child succeed will be followed by a second word, third, and so on. Sentence one word commonly called holophrastic greeting.
c. Sentences Two words        
The meaning of the sentence is a sentence of two words that only consists of two words, as a continuation of the sentence one word.
d. Sentence More
Mastery of sentence two words reached a certain stage, then developed the preparation of a sentence consisting of three words.   
3. Step Ahead School
What is meant by approaching schools here are ahead of entering elementary school, which at the time they were aged between five to six years. Education in kindergarten (TK), especially playgroups (playgroup) can not be considered as a school, because it is only to help the child is ready to enter primary education. When entering kindergarten children have mastered almost all the basic grammatical rules of the language. He was able to create news sentences, sentences Tanya, and a number of other construction purposes. Children in preschool now learn things outside of vocabulary and grammar. They are able to use the language in social context are manifold.